Are global communities more local than we might expect?
Reading a post by D’Arcy Norman expounding (a bit) on the global community of edubloggers that Josie Fraser is illustrating through her rather nifty use of the mapping tool Frappr got me thinking about how perhaps the massive globalisation of our communities through blogs might in fact be creating far more local communities than we already have.
Put it this way, existing pre-web and to a large degree pre-blog our communities were generally made up of people geographically close to us. Yes, there have always been conferences and yes there have, in an academic sense at least, always been journals and alike but essentially our day to day communities were the people we work and socialise with. In fact, the development of listservs, newsgroups and alike didn’t necessarily change this to any great degree, we were still essentially part of a particular group which we had joined and our communities were people in that group.
With blogs though things are a lot different, now we don’t need to join a group to have a voice, we don’t need to necessarily have to conform to particular group social norms and we don’t need to engage with a fixed community… we can subscribe, unsubscribe, comment and place ourselves wherever we so choose, and not even worry too much about acceptance!
However, while we’re doing this we’re essentially selecting to read and interact with people that we feel we can either learn something from, get along with or whom we are interested in. It’s become a very very easy process and I’m wondering what the negative impacts of that might be on the diversity and significance of what we draw from a traditional community.
In a traditional community there will, odds are, be a fair number of people who disagree with us. There will also, and perhaps more significantly, be a broad range of expertise, interests and backgrounds that we might not necessarily come up against if we get to choose and are not forced to interact with these ‘other’ people (that’s difficult you see). Strangely, blogs might be doing more than just creating an echo chamber and in fact be making us into more blinkered, less tolerant and more ‘local’ communities.
Or, is it an improvement… a more efficient rationalised community model for an increasingly rationalistic age?
Find expert WordPress and WordPress MultiUser (WPMU) development and consulting at Incsub.










About:


October 28th, 2005 at 2:15 am
Good post, James. I have to force myself to try to minimize the echo-chamber-effect by subscribing to a broad range of feeds, including many outside of the “edubloggers” list - to make sure I see things in a larger perspective. Of course, that takes a LOT of feeds :-)
October 28th, 2005 at 10:25 am
Yeh, I know, I tend to do the same thing, get overloaded with feeds and then end up cutting them back.
One thing I am always hankering after is good debate too and that’s so hard to find… we need a few more Greg Ritter caustic sorts, it’s almost tempting to get a bit nasty myself (which, to be honest, I sometimes do) to provoke a bit of discussion.
Or start subscribing to lots of peopel I disagree with.
Why not!
October 28th, 2005 at 11:22 am
AHAH! YOU’RE Leon Lighips! I knew it!!!
October 31st, 2005 at 9:21 am
I thought it was Lamb!
October 31st, 2005 at 10:29 am
[…] Are global communities more local than we might expect? James Farmer looks at and issue about how the mechanisims of globalisation actually can bring us together through commmunication. […]
October 31st, 2005 at 4:53 pm
[…] CJ’s posts on the importance of being a pain in the ass… a bit like I’ve been ‘advocating’ at Blogsavvy (and no, that does not make me Lighips ;) […]